Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Front Neurosci. 2010 Nov 25;4:184. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2010.00184. eCollection 2010.

A Comparison between Mechanisms of Multi-Alternative Perceptual Decision Making: Ability to Explain Human Behavior, Predictions for Neurophysiology, and Relationship with Decision Theory.

Author information

1
Center for Neuroscience and Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California Davis, CA, USA.

Abstract

While there seems to be relatively wide agreement about perceptual decision making relying on integration-to-threshold mechanisms, proposed models differ in a variety of details. This study compares a range of mechanisms for multi-alternative perceptual decision making, including integration with and without leakage, feedforward and feedback inhibition for mediating the competition between integrators, as well as linear and non-linear mechanisms for combining signals across alternatives. It is shown that a number of mechanisms make very similar predictions for the decision behavior and are therefore able to explain previously published data from a multi-alternative perceptual decision task. However, it is also demonstrated that the mechanisms differ in their internal dynamics and therefore make different predictions for neuorphysiological experiments. The study further addresses the relationship of these mechanisms with decision theory and statistical testing and analyzes their optimality.

KEYWORDS:

behavior; decision theory; mathematical models; multiple alternatives; neurophysiology; perceptual decisions

PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Frontiers Media SA Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center