Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Dec 14;56(25):2084-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.10.006.

Outcomes in diabetic and nondiabetic patients treated with everolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents: results from the SPIRIT IV clinical trial (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System).

Author information

1
The Christ Hospital Heart and Vascular Center and The Carl and Edyth Lindner Center for Research and Education, Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, USA. Lindner@thechristhospital.com

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

We compared the safety and efficacy of the XIENCE V (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) everolimus-eluting stent (EES) with the TAXUS Express (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) among the large cohort of randomized diabetic patients enrolled in the SPIRIT IV (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) trial.

BACKGROUND:

Diabetes mellitus remains a significant predictor of adverse clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents, and the comparative outcomes of different drug-eluting stents in diabetic patients remains ill-defined.

METHODS:

In the SPIRIT IV trial, 3,687 patients with up to 3 de novo native coronary artery lesions were prospectively randomized 2:1 to receive EES or PES. Randomization was stratified by the presence of diabetes and lesion complexity. The primary end point was the occurrence of target lesion failure (TLF) (cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) at 1 year. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in randomized diabetic (n = 1,185 [786 EES; 399 PES]) and nondiabetic patients (n = 2,498 [1,669 EES; 829 PES]).

RESULTS:

The EES compared with PES reduced TLF in nondiabetic patients (3.1% vs. 6.7%, p < 0.0001), with significant reductions in myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization. In contrast, no difference in TLF (6.4% vs. 6.9%, respectively, p = 0.80) or any of its components was present among diabetic patients, regardless of insulin use. A significant interaction between the presence of diabetes and stent type on TLF (p(interaction) = 0.02) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS:

In the SPIRIT IV randomized trial, EES compared with PES provided similar clinical outcomes in diabetic patients and superior clinical outcomes in nondiabetic patients at 1 year. (SPIRIT IV Clinical Trial: Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Subjects With de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions; NCT00307047).

PMID:
21144968
DOI:
10.1016/j.jacc.2010.10.006
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center