Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Contraception. 2011 Jan;83(1):88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.06.016. Epub 2010 Oct 6.

The promise of affordable implants: is cost recovery possible in Kenya?

Author information

1
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. ktumlin@email.unc.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Contraceptive implants are one of the most effective methods of family planning but remain underutilized due to their relatively high upfront cost. The increasing availability of a low-cost implant may reduce financial barriers and increase uptake of implants. The commodity cost of Sino-implant (II) is approximately 60% less than two other widely available implants, and a direct service delivery cost of approximately US$12 makes it one of the most cost-effective methods available. This study was conducted to assess whether implant clients in Kenya are paying as much or more than the direct service delivery cost of Sino-implant (II).

STUDY DESIGN:

A study was conducted in 22 facilities throughout Kenya, including public (n=8), private for-profit (n=6) and private not-for-profit facilities (n=8). Interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of 293 current and returning implant clients after at least 6 months of product use.

RESULTS:

The median price for implant insertion paid by clients in the public, private for-profit and private not-for-profit sectors was US$1.30, US$13.30 and US$20.00, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Patient fees in both private sectors allow for 100% recovery of the direct cost of providing Sino-implant (II). Currently in Kenya, all sectors can receive donated commodities free of charge; Sino-implant (II) has the potential to reduce reliance on donor-supplied implants and thereby improve contraceptive security.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center