Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jan;15(1):11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.10.002. Epub 2010 Dec 2.

Mind the gap: bridging economic and naturalistic risk-taking with cognitive neuroscience.

Author information

1
Imaging Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78759, USA.

Abstract

Economists define risk in terms of the variability of possible outcomes, whereas clinicians and laypeople generally view risk as exposure to possible loss or harm. Neuroeconomic studies using relatively simple behavioral tasks have identified a network of brain regions that respond to economic risk, but these studies have had limited success predicting naturalistic risk-taking. By contrast, more complex behavioral tasks developed by clinicians (e.g. Balloon Analogue Risk Task and Iowa Gambling Task) correlate with naturalistic risk-taking but resist decomposition into distinct cognitive constructs. We propose here that to bridge this gap and better understand neural substrates of naturalistic risk-taking, new tasks are needed that: are decomposable into basic cognitive and/or economic constructs; predict naturalistic risk-taking; and engender dynamic, affective engagement.

PMID:
21130018
PMCID:
PMC3014440
DOI:
10.1016/j.tics.2010.10.002
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center