Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Vision Res. 2011 Jan;51(1):187-94. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.11.004. Epub 2010 Nov 17.

Implied motion from static photographs influences the perceived position of stationary objects.

Author information

1
Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Via Venezia 8, 35131 Padua, Italy. andrea.pavan.1@unipd.it

Abstract

A growing amount of evidence suggests that viewing a photograph depicting motion activates the same direction-selective neurons involved in the perception of real motion. It has been shown that prolonged exposure (adaptation) to photographs depicting directional motion can induce motion adaptation and consequently motion aftereffect. The present study investigated whether adapting to photographs depicting humans, animals, and vehicles that move leftward or rightward also generates a positional aftereffect (the motion-induced position shift--MIPS), in which the perceived spatial position of a target pattern is shifted in the opposite direction to that of adaptation. Results showed that adapting to still photographs depicting objects that move in a particular direction shifts the perceived position of subsequently presented stationary objects opposite to the depicted adaptation direction and that this effect depends on the retinotopic location of the adapting stimulus. These results suggest that the implied motion could activate the same direction-selective and speed-tuned mechanisms that produce positional aftereffect when viewing real motion.

PMID:
21092745
DOI:
10.1016/j.visres.2010.11.004
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center