Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Rofo. 2010 Nov;182(11):965-72. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245509. Epub 2010 Oct 18.

[Targeted methods for measuring patient satisfaction in a radiological center].

[Article in German]

Author information

1
Klinik für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin. martin.maurer@charite.de

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To investigate two event-oriented methods for evaluating patient satisfaction with radiological services like outpatient computed tomography (CT) examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

159 patients (55% men, 45% women) were asked to complete a questionnaire to provide information about their satisfaction with their examination. At first, patients were asked to spontaneously recall notably positive and negative aspects (so-called "critical incidents", critical incident technique = CIT) of the examination. Subsequently a flow chart containing all single steps of the examination procedure was shown to all patients. They were asked to point out the positive and negative aspects they perceived at each step (so-called sequential incident technique = SIT).

RESULTS:

The CIT-based part of the questionnaire yielded 356 comments (183 positive and 173 negative), which were assigned to one of four categories: interaction of staff with patient, procedure and organization, CT examination, and overall setting of the examination. Significantly more detailed comments regarding individual aspects of the CT examination were elicited in the second part of the survey, which was based on the SIT. There were 1413 statements with a significantly higher number of positive comments (n = 939, 66%) versus negative comments (n = 474, 34%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

The critical and sequential incident techniques are suitable to measure the subjective satisfaction with the delivery of radiological services such as CT examinations. Positive comments confirm the adequacy of the existing procedures, while negative comments provide direct information about how service quality can be improved.

PMID:
20957594
DOI:
10.1055/s-0029-1245509
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York
    Loading ...
    Support Center