Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Ageing Res Rev. 2011 Jan;10(1):104-14. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2010.09.001. Epub 2010 Sep 17.

Outcome instruments to measure frailty: a systematic review.

Author information

1
Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 114, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. N.devries@iq.umcn.nl

Abstract

Frailty is one of the greatest challenges for healthcare professionals. The level of frailty depends on several interrelated factors and can change over time while different interventions seem to be able to influence the level of frailty. Therefore, an outcome instrument to measure frailty with sound clinimetric properties is needed. A systematic review on evaluative measures of frailty was performed in the databases PubMed, EMBASE, Cinahl and Cochrane. The results show numerous instruments that measure the level of frailty. This article gives a clear overview of the content of these frailty instruments and describes their clinimetric properties. Frailty instruments, however, are often developed as prognostic instruments and have also been validated as such. The clinimetric properties of these instruments as evaluative outcome measures are unclear.

PMID:
20850567
DOI:
10.1016/j.arr.2010.09.001
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center