Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Proteome Res. 2010 Nov 5;9(11):5748-56. doi: 10.1021/pr1005247. Epub 2010 Oct 8.

Combined statistical analyses of peptide intensities and peptide occurrences improves identification of significant peptides from MS-based proteomics data.

Author information

1
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, USA. bj@pnl.gov

Abstract

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based (LC-MS) proteomics uses peak intensities of proteolytic peptides to infer the differential abundance of peptides/proteins. However, substantial run-to-run variability in intensities and observations (presence/absence) of peptides makes data analysis quite challenging. The missing observations in LC-MS proteomics data are difficult to address with traditional imputation-based approaches because the mechanisms by which data are missing are unknown a priori. Data can be missing due to random mechanisms such as experimental error or nonrandom mechanisms such as a true biological effect. We present a statistical approach that uses a test of independence known as a G-test to test the null hypothesis of independence between the number of missing values across experimental groups. We pair the G-test results, evaluating independence of missing data (IMD) with an analysis of variance (ANOVA) that uses only means and variances computed from the observed data. Each peptide is therefore represented by two statistical confidence metrics, one for qualitative differential observation and one for quantitative differential intensity. We use three LC-MS data sets to demonstrate the robustness and sensitivity of the IMD-ANOVA approach.

PMID:
20831241
PMCID:
PMC2974810
DOI:
10.1021/pr1005247
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for American Chemical Society Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center