Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Semin Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep;23(3):165-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2010.05.009.

Interpretation of the results of OVER in the context of EVAR trial, DREAM, and the EUROSTAR registry.

Author information

1
Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. mbmalas@jhmi.edu

Abstract

Several early studies have shown the benefit of endovascular aneurysm repair in reducing procedure-related mortality and morbidity of open aneurysm repair. Three prospective randomized trials have addressed the advantages and disadvantages of the two procedures. These studies had shown some conflicting findings in survival and complications. We reviewed the largest registry for endovascular abdominal aortic repair and the three randomized trials to evaluate the similarities and differences in their outcomes. Cross-comparison of operative, aneurysm-related and all-cause mortality is presented. Patient characteristics, device specifications, procedure morbidity and reintervention rate of each study are evaluated.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center