Separating DNA with different topologies by atomic force microscopy in comparison with gel electrophoresis

J Phys Chem B. 2010 Sep 23;114(37):12162-5. doi: 10.1021/jp105603k.

Abstract

Atomic force microscopy, which is normally used for DNA imaging to gain qualitative results, can also be used for quantitative DNA research, at a single-molecular level. Here, we evaluate the performance of AFM imaging specifically for quantifying supercoiled and relaxed plasmid DNA fractions within a mixture, and compare the results with the bulk material analysis method, gel electrophoresis. The advantages and shortcomings of both methods are discussed in detail. Gel electrophoresis is a quick and well-established quantification method. However, it requires a large amount of DNA, and needs to be carefully calibrated for even slightly different experimental conditions for accurate quantification. AFM imaging is accurate, in that single DNA molecules in different conformations can be seen and counted. When used carefully with necessary correction, both methods provide consistent results. Thus, AFM imaging can be used for DNA quantification, as an alternative to gel electrophoresis.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Calibration
  • DNA / chemistry*
  • DNA / isolation & purification*
  • DNA, Superhelical / chemistry
  • DNA, Superhelical / isolation & purification
  • Electrophoresis, Agar Gel / methods*
  • Microscopy, Atomic Force / methods*
  • Plasmids / chemistry
  • Plasmids / isolation & purification

Substances

  • DNA, Superhelical
  • DNA