Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2010 Nov;7(4):245-52. doi: 10.1007/s11904-010-0056-2.

Readiness: the state of the science (or the lack thereof).

Author information

1
Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Richard.M.Grimes@uth.tmc.edu

Abstract

HIV treatment guidelines state that patients' readiness should be assessed before initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) to assure adherence. None of the guidelines provide a way to measure readiness. Therefore, this article sought to review the literature on readiness to determine if there was a viable predictor of adherence. Twenty-seven articles were reviewed. Nine described studies that examined the relationship between a measure of readiness and HAART adherence. No readiness measure demonstrated clinical utility as a predictor of adherence. Study flaws included small sample sizes (only one study >100 patients), short follow-up periods (all ≤1 year and six were ≤5 months, four ≤1 month), measures of readiness that related poorly to adherence, and inconsistent adherence measures (eight different measures were used by the researchers). Neither the guidelines nor the literature will help clinicians judge who should initiate HAART and who should delay treatment.

PMID:
20714831
PMCID:
PMC2989238
DOI:
10.1007/s11904-010-0056-2
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center