Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Chest. 2011 Apr;139(4):764-774. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0991. Epub 2010 Jul 29.

Effects of water-pipe smoking on lung function: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Author information

1
Department of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
2
Department of Family Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
3
Department of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY; Department of Family Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
4
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Balamand, Beirut, Lebanon.
5
Department of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY; Department of Family Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY; Departments of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Electronic address: elieakl@buffalo.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Although common in many Middle Eastern countries, water-pipe tobacco smoking, commonly known as water-pipe smoking (WPS), is increasingly popular in Western cultures. The primary objective of this study was to systematically review the effects of WPS on lung function. The secondary objective was to compare the effects of WPS and cigarette smoking on lung function.

METHODS:

We conducted a systematic review using the approach of the Cochrane Collaboration to search for, select, and abstract studies. We conducted two separate meta-analyses comparing water-pipe smokers with nonsmokers, and water-pipe smokers with cigarette smokers for each of three spirometric measurements (FEV₁, FVC, and FEV₁/ FVC). We used the standardized mean difference (SMD) to pool the results.

RESULTS:

Six cross-sectional studies were eligible for this review. Compared with no smoking, WPS was associated with a statistically significant reduction in FEV₁ (SMD = -0.43; 95% CI, -0.58 to -0.29; equivalent to a 4.04% lower FEV₁%), a trend toward lower FVC (SMD = -0.15; 95% CI, -0.34 to 0.04; equivalent to a 1.38% reduction in FVC%), and lower FEV₁/ FVC (SMD = -0.46; 95% CI, -0.93 to 0.01; equivalent to a 3.08% lower FEV₁/ FVC). Comparing WPS with cigarette smoking, there was no statistically significant difference in FEV₁, FVC, and FEV₁/ FVC. The six studies suffered from methodologic limitations.

CONCLUSIONS:

WPS negatively affects lung function and may be as harmful as cigarette smoking. WPS, therefore, is likely to be a cause of COPD.

PMID:
20671057
DOI:
10.1378/chest.10-0991
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center