Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Int Orthop. 2011 Feb;35(2):151-5. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1097-2. Epub 2010 Jul 23.

Estimating implant survival in the presence of competing risks.

Author information

1
Département de Biostatistique et Informatique Médicale, Université Paris-Diderot, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, Paris, France. djmbiau@yahoo.fr

Abstract

In medical research, commonly, one is interested in the time to the occurrence of a particular event, such as the revision of an implant, and the analysis of these data is referred to as survival analysis. However, for some patients, the event is not observed and their observations are censored. These censored observations are particular to survival data and require specific methods for estimation. The Kaplan and Meier method is a popular method to estimate the probability of being free of the event over time and it is now widely applied in orthopaedics such as to report implant survival. However, one of the assumptions underlying the Kaplan-Meier estimator implies that patients whose observations are censored have the same risk of occurrence of the event than patients remaining in the study. However, because the revision of an implant cannot occur after a patient dies, and that dead patients have their observations censored in the Kaplan-Meier method, another setting must be considered. In the sequel we will demonstrate the inadequacy of the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate implant survival and detail the cumulative incidence estimator.

PMID:
20652695
PMCID:
PMC3032115
DOI:
10.1007/s00264-010-1097-2
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center