Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):356-66. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1190-z. Epub 2010 Jul 7.

Review of methods for objective surgical skill evaluation.

Author information

1
Laboratory of Computational Sensing and Robotics Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA. creiley@jhu.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Rising health and financial costs associated with iatrogenic errors have drawn increasing attention to the dexterity of surgeons. With the advent of new technologies, such as robotic surgical systems and medical simulators, researchers now have the tools to analyze surgical motion with the goal of differentiating the level of technical skill in surgeons.

METHODS:

The review for this paper is obtained from a Google Scholar and PubMed search of the key words "objective surgical skill evaluation." Only studies that included motion analysis were used.

RESULTS:

In this paper, we provide a clinical motivation for the importance of surgical skill evaluation. We review the current methods of tracking surgical motion and the available data-collection systems. We also survey current methods of surgical skill evaluation and show that most approaches fall into one of three methods: (1) structured human grading; (2) descriptive statistics; or (3) statistical language models of surgical motion. We discuss the need for an encompassing approach to model human skill through statistical models to allow for objective skill evaluation.

PMID:
20607563
DOI:
10.1007/s00464-010-1190-z
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Support Center