Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jul-Aug;17(4):373-4. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.004507.

Wikipedia and osteosarcoma: a trustworthy patients' information?

Author information

1
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. andreas.leithner@medunigraz.at

Abstract

The English version of the online encyclopedia, Wikipedia, has been recently reported to be the prominent source of online health information. However, there is little information concerning the quality of information found in Wikipedia. Therefore, we created a questionnaire asking for scope, completeness, and accuracy of information found on osteosarcoma. Three independent observers tested the English version of Wikipedia, as well as the patient version and the health professional version of the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) website. Answers were verified with authoritative resources and international guidelines. The results of our study demonstrate that the quality of osteosarcoma-related information found in the English Wikipedia is good but inferior to the patient information provided by the NCI. Therefore, non-peer-reviewed commonly used websites offering health information, such as Wikipedia, should include links to more definitive sources, such as those maintained by the NCI and professional international organizations on healthcare treatments. Furthermore, frequent checks should make sure such external links are to the highest quality and to the best-maintained aggregate sites on a given healthcare topic.

Comment on

PMID:
20595302
PMCID:
PMC2995655
DOI:
10.1136/jamia.2010.004507
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center