Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(2):157-68.

Construct validity of RT3 accelerometer: a comparison of level-ground and treadmill walking at self-selected speeds.

Author information

1
Centre for Physiotherapy Research, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. paul.hendrick@otago.ac.nz

Abstract

This study examined differences in accelerometer output when subjects walked on level ground and on a treadmill. We asked 25 nondisabled participants to wear an RT3 triaxial accelerometer (StayHealthy, Inc; Monrovia, California) and walk at their "normal" and "brisk" walking speeds for 10 minutes. These activities were repeated on a treadmill using the individual speeds from level-ground walking on two occasions 1 week apart. Paired t-tests found a difference in RT3 accelerometer vector magnitude (VM) counts/min between the two walking speeds on both surfaces on days 1 and 2 (p < 0.001). Although we found no significant differences between VM counts/min on the two surfaces at normal and brisk speeds on days 1 and 2 (p > 0.05), we found wide limits of agreement between level ground and treadmill walking at both speeds. Measurement and discrimination of walking intensity employing RT3 accelerometer VM counts/min on the treadmill demonstrated reasonable validity and stability over two time points compared with level-ground walking.

PMID:
20593329
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Department of Veterans Affairs, Rehabilitation Research & Development Service
Loading ...
Support Center