Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010 Sep;30(9):1558-63. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.95. Epub 2010 Jun 23.

Statistics in experimental cerebrovascular research: comparison of more than two groups with a continuous outcome variable.

Author information

1
Department of Medical Statistics, Computer Sciences and Documentation, University Hospital of Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.

Abstract

A common setting in experimental cerebrovascular research is the comparison of more than two experimental groups. Often, continuous measures such as infarct volume, cerebral blood flow, or vessel diameter are the primary variables of interest. This article presents the principles of the statistical analysis of comparing more than two groups using analysis of variance (ANOVA). We will also explain post hoc comparisons, which are required to show which groups significantly differ once ANOVA has rejected the null hypothesis. Although statistical packages perform ANOVA and post hoc contrast at a key stroke, in this study, we use examples from experimental stroke research to reveal the simple math behind the calculations and the basic principles. This will enable the reader to understand and correctly interpret the readout of statistical packages and to help prevent common errors in the comparison of multiple means.

PMID:
20571520
PMCID:
PMC2949261
DOI:
10.1038/jcbfm.2010.95
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center