Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Anesth Analg. 2010 Aug;111(2):482-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e3a08e. Epub 2010 Jun 7.

Focused review: ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for epidural labor analgesia.

Author information

1
Department of Anesthesiology, The Mount Sinai Medical Center, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA. Yaakov.beilin@mountsinai.or

Abstract

Neuraxial analgesia is frequently administered to women in labor. For many years, bupivacaine has been used because of its long duration of action, lack of excessive motor block, and minimal fetal and neonatal effects. However, bupivacaine is one of the most cardiotoxic local anesthetics in current use and motor block is still a problem. Many local anesthetics such as bupivacaine exist in 2 forms, levorotatory and dextrorotatory. Ropivacaine, an amide local anesthetic produced in the pure levorotatory form addresses some of the concerns related to bupivacaine. In this article, we present the literature comparing ropivacaine and bupivacaine to determine whether there is an advantage to using one of these local anesthetics for labor analgesia. We found that there is no advantage to the routine use of ropivacaine for labor analgesia.

PMID:
20529986
DOI:
10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e3a08e
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
    Loading ...
    Support Center