Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2010 Aug;64(4):367-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2010.02098.x. Epub 2010 May 10.

Do we need to flick the switch? The need for a broader conceptualization of iatrogenic course aggravation in clinical trials of bipolar disorder.

Author information

1
Department of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, Barwon Health, University of Melbourne, Swanston Centre, Vic. 3220, Australia. mikebe@barwonhealth.org.au

Abstract

The term 'switching' is often used in bipolar disorder when describing polarity changes in bipolar disorder, but this term is ambiguous and imprecise, and is sometimes used interchangeably with the term 'cycling'. Furthermore, polarity changes in bipolar disorder can be understood in different ways, because their clinical manifestations range from the emergence of subthreshold symptoms to a full episode of the opposite pole. Besides the need to tighten the meaning of the term 'switching', this paper also argues that switching does not adequately describe the complex phenomena that occur with course aggravation of bipolar disorder, such as alteration in episode frequency or amplitude. A more-fine grained approach to course aggravation in bipolar disorder is proposed, which incorporates trans-polar switching, index polarity aggravation, as well as alterations in episodic amplitude, episodic duration, and inter-episode length. This approach has the potential to capture a broader, more fine-grained and clinically relevant picture of the process of aggravation of the bipolar cycle.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Support Center