Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Bull Math Biol. 2010 Oct;72(7):1820-39. doi: 10.1007/s11538-010-9510-y. Epub 2010 May 7.

Robustness of phylogenetic inference based on minimum evolution.

Author information

1
Méthodes et Algorithmes pour la Bioinformatique, LIRMM, CNRS-Université de Montpellier, 161 rue Ada, 34392 Montpellier, France. pardi@lirmm.fr

Abstract

Minimum evolution is the guiding principle of an important class of distance-based phylogeny reconstruction methods, including neighbor-joining (NJ), which is the most cited tree inference algorithm to date. The minimum evolution principle involves searching for the tree with minimum length, where the length is estimated using various least-squares criteria. Since evolutionary distances cannot be known precisely but only estimated, it is important to investigate the robustness of phylogenetic reconstruction to imprecise estimates for these distances. The safety radius is a measure of this robustness: it consists of the maximum relative deviation that the input distances can have from the correct distances, without compromising the reconstruction of the correct tree structure. Answering some open questions, we here derive the safety radius of two popular minimum evolution criteria: balanced minimum evolution (BME) and minimum evolution based on ordinary least squares (OLS + ME). Whereas BME has a radius of 1/2, which is the best achievable, OLS + ME has a radius tending to 0 as the number of taxa increases. This difference may explain the gap in reconstruction accuracy observed in practice between OLS + ME and BME (which forms the basis of popular programs such as NJ and FastME).

PMID:
20449671
DOI:
10.1007/s11538-010-9510-y
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Support Center