Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Public Health. 2011 Feb;56(1):15-24. doi: 10.1007/s00038-010-0143-6. Epub 2010 Apr 27.

Toxocara infection in the United States: the relevance of poverty, geography and demography as risk factors, and implications for estimating county prevalence.

Author information

1
Department of Geography, Center for Statistics, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK. p.congdon@qmul.ac.uk

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To estimate Toxocara infection rates by age, gender and ethnicity for US counties using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

METHODS:

After initial analysis to account for missing data, a binary regression model is applied to obtain relative risks of Toxocara infection for 20,396 survey subjects. The regression incorporates interplay between demographic attributes (age, ethnicity and gender), family poverty and geographic context (region, metropolitan status). Prevalence estimates for counties are then made, distinguishing between subpopulations in poverty and not in poverty.

RESULTS:

Even after allowing for elevated infection risk associated with poverty, seropositivity is elevated among Black non-Hispanics and other ethnic groups. There are also distinct effects of region. When regression results are translated into county prevalence estimates, the main influences on variation in county rates are percentages of non-Hispanic Blacks and county poverty.

CONCLUSIONS:

For targeting prevention it is important to assess implications of national survey data for small area prevalence. Using data from NHANES, the study confirms that both individual level risk factors and geographic contextual factors affect chances of Toxocara infection.

PMID:
20422250
DOI:
10.1007/s00038-010-0143-6
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center