Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Horm Res Paediatr. 2010;74(1):15-22. doi: 10.1159/000313592. Epub 2010 Apr 20.

Validation of bone age methods by their ability to predict adult height.

Author information

1
Visiana, Holte, Denmark.

Abstract

AIM:

Several bone age (BA) methods are in use today. The aim of this study was to introduce a framework for assessing the validity of a BA method by its ability to predict adult height (H) and to apply it to manual ratings based on Greulich-Pyle (GP) and Tanner-Whitehouse 3 (TW) and to the fully automated BoneXpert method.

MATERIAL:

The study used X-rays of 232 children from the First Zurich Longitudinal Study recorded close to each anniversary.

METHOD:

For each height measurement (h), we calculated the growth potential (gp), defined as gp = (H-h)/H. The standard deviation of the gp prediction error for children of the same age was taken as a measure of the validity of the BA method and averaged over the age range 10-18 years for boys and 8-16 years for girls to obtain the overall gp prediction error (GPPE).

RESULTS:

Manual TW yielded GPPE = 1.32% [95% CI 1.28-1.36], and was significantly outperformed by manual GP with GPPE = 1.26% [1.22-1.30]. The automated rating obtained GPPE = 1.23%, and omitting radius and ulna yielded GPPE = 1.22%.

CONCLUSION:

Manual GP rating is better than manual TW rating in predicting adult height, and the fully automated method works as well as manual GP rating.

PMID:
20407234
DOI:
10.1159/000313592
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for S. Karger AG, Basel, Switzerland
Loading ...
Support Center