Send to

Choose Destination
Eur Radiol. 2010 Aug;20(8):1878-85. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1749-z. Epub 2010 Mar 20.

Lung nodule volumetry: segmentation algorithms within the same software package cannot be used interchangeably.

Author information

Department of Radiology, Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University, Hellerup, Denmark.



We examined the reproducibility of lung nodule volumetry software that offers three different volumetry algorithms.


In a lung cancer screening trial, 188 baseline nodules >5 mm were identified. Including follow-ups, these nodules formed a study-set of 545 nodules. Nodules were independently double read by two readers using commercially available volumetry software. The software offers readers three different analysing algorithms. We compared the inter-observer variability of nodule volumetry when the readers used the same and different algorithms.


Both readers were able to correctly segment and measure 72% of nodules. In 80% of these cases, the readers chose the same algorithm. When readers used the same algorithm, exactly the same volume was measured in 50% of readings and a difference of >25% was observed in 4%. When the readers used different algorithms, 83% of measurements showed a difference of >25%.


Modern volumetric software failed to correctly segment a high number of screen detected nodules. While choosing a different algorithm can yield better segmentation of a lung nodule, reproducibility of volumetric measurements deteriorates substantially when different algorithms were used. It is crucial even in the same software package to choose identical parameters for follow-up.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center