Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 Dec;23(12):1487-92. doi: 10.3109/14767051003678176. Epub 2010 Mar 17.

Vaginal birth after two previous c-sections: obstetricians-gynaecologists opinions and practice patterns.

Author information

1
Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Femme-Mère-Enfant, Service d'obstétrique, F-69677 Bron, Lyon, France. muriel.doret@chu-lyon.fr

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate obstetricians' practice patterns, opinions and factors influencing decision-making about mode of delivery in women with two previous c-sections.

METHODS:

A questionnaire was mailed to the 160 obstetricians from the Rhone-Alpes perinatal network. Questionnaires included demographic, organisational information and questions about physicians' opinion, practice patterns and patient counseling concerning vaginal birth after c-section (VBAC) after one and two caesarean sections.

RESULTS:

Response rate was 65.6%, 100% and 23.8% would offer VBAC to women with respectively one and two previous c-sections. Uterine rupture rate was largely overestimated in both women with one (2.8%) and two prior c-sections (14.2%). Factors positively influencing obstetricians were cerebral palsy estimated rate less than 20%, a minimal decision to birth delay less than 20 min when emergency c-section would be required. Neonatal severe outcomes consecutive to trial of labour as well as placenta praevia or accreta risk and morbidity associated with multiple c-sections would be insufficiently discussed.

CONCLUSION:

Obstetricians largely prefer a third planned c-section in women with two previous c-sections. This decision is partly based on a large overestimation of immediate maternal and neonatal serious outcomes consecutive to trial of labour as well documented serious long term outcomes of multiple c-sections are insufficiently considered.

PMID:
20233132
DOI:
10.3109/14767051003678176
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Taylor & Francis
Loading ...
Support Center