Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Feb;136(2):159-62. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2009.170.

Reproducibility of clinical grading of tonsillar size.

Author information

1
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin NT, Hong Kong SAR.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the reproducibility of the Brodsky grading scale and the modified 3-grade and 5-grade scales in reporting the size of the tonsils.

DESIGN:

Retrospective review of 60 video recordings of tonsil examination by 12 independent observers with different clinical backgrounds and various levels of training. The sizes of the tonsils were graded using different grading scales.

SETTING:

Tertiary care university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS:

The video recordings were chosen from an ongoing epidemiologic study of sleep-related breathing disorder in children in Hong Kong. Main Outcomes Measures The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of each grading scale was determined using intraclass correlation. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) exceeding 0.75 was set a priori to indicate an acceptable level of reliability.

RESULTS:

The mean intraobserver ICCs for the Brodsky grading scale and the modified 3-grade and 5-grade scales were 0.858, 0.830, and 0.865, respectively. The mean interobserver ICCs for the Brodsky grading scale and the modified 3-grade and 5-grade scales were 0.763, 0.739, and 0.783, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

The Brodsky grading scale and the modified 5-grade scale achieved acceptable intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility.

PMID:
20157062
DOI:
10.1001/archoto.2009.170
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center