Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Postgrad Med J. 2010 Feb;86(1012):123-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.025015.

Doctors' views of attitudes towards peer medical error.

Author information

Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.



This study aims at evaluating doctors' attitudes towards handling medical errors made by their peers.


This cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted between April and July 2006 and targeted general practitioners attending continuing medical education programmes in Tehran. A total of 474 doctors were approached, 400 of whom completed the questionnaire. The questionnaire contained a clinical vignette with three hypothetical patient outcomes: near-miss, leading to harm, and leading to death. The participants were asked how they would deal with each case. They were also asked how they would prefer their peers to react when they themselves made a medical error.


The most common attitude toward peers' medical errors was reporting it to the original doctor and asking them to disclose it to the patient (near-miss: 63.0%; 95% CI 58% to 68%; leading to harm: 70.0%; 95% CI 65.4% to 74.6%; and leading to death: 62.5%; 95% CI 57.5% to 67.5%). In most cases, doctors expected their peers to report their medical errors to them (92.7%; 95% CI 89.7% to 93.0). About 67% of the participating doctors had encountered a peer's medical error in the past 6 months, although 90% of them had received no or very little training in dealing with this issue.


The most acceptable approach to dealing with a peer's medical error is to report it to the responsible doctor and encourage them to disclose it to the patient.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons


    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Support Center