Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2010 Jan-Feb;55(1):20-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.02.014.

Measurement of blood loss: review of the literature.

Author information

1
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, TN 37240, USA. mavis.schorn@vanderbilt.edu

Abstract

It is important to recognize excessive blood loss during childbirth, which is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. This article reviews methods to measure blood loss that could be used during childbirth. PubMed, CINAHL, and MEDLINE databases were searched using the phrases "blood loss" and "measurement." The bibliographies of publications were scanned for applicable references. A total of 46 publications are included in this review. The methods used to measure blood loss are categorized into visual estimation, direct measurement, gravimetric, photometry, and miscellaneous. Methods are described and compared. A combination of direct measurement and gravimetric methods are the most practical. Photometry is the most precise, but also the most expensive and complex to use. A variety of miscellaneous methods are presented, but none is a practical or reliable method. Visual estimation of blood loss is so inaccurate that its continued use in practice is questionable and it should not be used in research to evaluate treatment.

PMID:
20129226
DOI:
10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.02.014
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Support Center