Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010 Jan-Feb;41(1):109-14. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20091230-20.

Comparison of torsional and microburst longitudinal phacoemulsification: a prospective, randomized, masked clinical trial.

Author information

1
Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Raghudeep Eye Clinic, Gurukul Road, Memnagar, Ahmedabad-380 052, India.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:

To compare intraoperative performance and postoperative outcome of three phacoemulsification technologies in patients undergoing microcoaxial phacoemulsification through 2.2-mm corneal incisions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

The prospective, randomized, single-masked study included 360 eyes randomly assigned to torsional (Infiniti Vision System; Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX), microburst with longitudinal (Infiniti), or microburst with longitudinal (Legacy Everest, Alcon Laboratories) ultrasound. Assessments included surgical clock time, fluid volume, and intraoperative complications, central corneal thickness on day 1 and months 1 and 3 postoperatively, and endothelial cell density at 3 months postoperatively. Comparisons among groups were conducted.

RESULTS:

Torsional ultrasound required significantly less surgical clock time and fluid volume than the other groups. There were no intraoperative complications. Change in central corneal thickness and endothelial cell loss was significantly lower in the torsional ultrasound group at all postoperative visits (P < .001, Kruskal-Wallis test) compared to microburst longitudinal ultrasound modalities.

CONCLUSION:

Torsional ultrasound demonstrated quantitatively superior intraoperative performance and showed less increase in corneal thickness and less endothelial cell loss compared to microburst longitudinal ultrasound.

PMID:
20128580
DOI:
10.3928/15428877-20091230-20
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center