Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Dec;2(12):1381-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.08.007.

Arterial remodeling in [corrected] subclinical carotid artery disease.

Erratum in

  • JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Feb;3(2):226.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

We sought to identify clinical and/or plaque characteristics that affect atherosclerotic disease progression and arterial remodeling in the carotid artery with subclinical stenosis.

BACKGROUND:

Increasing severity of stenosis has been associated with a higher risk of stroke. Factors that drive subclinical lesions to become stenotic plaques remain ambiguous. Carotid magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been validated with histology to accurately quantify in vivo arterial morphology and plaque composition.

METHODS:

A total of 67 asymptomatic participants with 16% to 49% carotid stenosis as demonstrated by duplex ultrasonography were imaged at 1.5-T with a carotid MRI protocol at baseline and at 18-month follow-up. Clinical and/or intra-arterial metrics with a significant association with change in plaque burden during multivariate analysis were evaluated for effects on lumen, wall, and total vessel volume.

RESULTS:

From multiple regression analysis, intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) (p < 0.001) and statin therapy (p = 0.015) were identified as key determinants of change in plaque burden. The group with IPH compared with the group without IPH demonstrated luminal narrowing, with a mean +/- SD decrease in lumen volume (-24.9 +/- 21.1 mm(3)/year vs. -0.5 +/- 26.9 mm(3)/year; p = 0.005), a larger increase in wall volume (44.1 +/- 36.1 mm(3)/year vs. 0.8 +/- 34.5 mm(3)/year; p < 0.001), and no difference in total vessel volume (19.3 +/- 27.4 mm(3)/year vs. 0.4 +/- 42.4 mm(3)/year; p = 0.15). The nonstatin group compared with the statin group demonstrated outward remodeling, with an increase in wall volume (22.4 +/- 35.6 mm(3)/year(3)/year vs. 0.9 +/- 38.0 mm(3)/year; p = 0.026) and total vessel volume (19.2 +/- 36.9 mm(3)/year vs. -4.9 +/- 40.4 mm(3)/year; p = 0.019) and no difference in lumen volume (-5.8 +/- 26.6 mm(3)/year vs. -3.2 +/- 29.5 mm(3)/year; p = 0.72).

CONCLUSIONS:

IPH may represent an indication of accelerated plaque growth and impending luminal compromise in the subclinical carotid artery. Statin therapy may stabilize lesions by slowing or halting lesion progression. This phase of plaque stenosis (16% to 49%) may be a critical stage for intrinsic and extrinsic factors to affect the atherosclerotic disease process.

PMID:
20083072
PMCID:
PMC2830091
DOI:
10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.08.007
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center