Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Stat Methods Med Res. 2009 Dec;18(6):565-75. doi: 10.1177/0962280209351908.

Gene set enrichment analysis made simple.

Author information

1
Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Erratum in

  • Stat Methods Med Res. 2011 Oct;20(5):571.

Abstract

Among the many applications of microarray technology, one of the most popular is the identification of genes that are differentially expressed in two conditions. A common statistical approach is to quantify the interest of each gene with a p-value, adjust these p-values for multiple comparisons, choose an appropriate cut-off, and create a list of candidate genes. This approach has been criticised for ignoring biological knowledge regarding how genes work together. Recently a series of methods, that do incorporate biological knowledge, have been proposed. However, the most popular method, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), seems overly complicated. Furthermore, GSEA is based on a statistical test known for its lack of sensitivity. In this article we compare the performance of a simple alternative to GSEA. We find that this simple solution clearly outperforms GSEA. We demonstrate this with eight different microarray datasets.

PMID:
20048385
PMCID:
PMC3134237
DOI:
10.1177/0962280209351908
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Atypon Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center