Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2009 Dec;4(4):417-22. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsp053.

The principled control of false positives in neuroimaging.

Author information

1
Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA. bennett@psych.ucsb.edu

Abstract

An incredible amount of data is generated in the course of a functional neuroimaging experiment. The quantity of data gives us improved temporal and spatial resolution with which to evaluate our results. It also creates a staggering multiple testing problem. A number of methods have been created that address the multiple testing problem in neuroimaging in a principled fashion. These methods place limits on either the familywise error rate (FWER) or the false discovery rate (FDR) of the results. These principled approaches are well established in the literature and are known to properly limit the amount of false positives across the whole brain. However, a minority of papers are still published every month using methods that are improperly corrected for the number of tests conducted. These latter methods place limits on the voxelwise probability of a false positive and yield no information on the global rate of false positives in the results. In this commentary, we argue in favor of a principled approach to the multiple testing problem--one that places appropriate limits on the rate of false positives across the whole brain gives readers the information they need to properly evaluate the results.

PMID:
20042432
PMCID:
PMC2799957
DOI:
10.1093/scan/nsp053
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Silverchair Information Systems Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center