Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Ann Oncol. 2010 Jul;21(7):1462-7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp551. Epub 2009 Dec 17.

Economic evaluation of docetaxel-gemcitabine versus vinorelbine-cisplatin combination as front-line treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer in Greece: a cost-minimization analysis.

Author information

1
Department of Health Services Management, National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece. nmaniadakis@nsph.gr

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

An economic evaluation was undertaken, alongside a randomized phase III study, to assess docetaxel-gemcitabine (DG) relative to vinorelbine-cisplatin (VC) combination as front-line treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS:

No differences were found in efficacy, thus a cost-minimization analysis was carried out. Treatment cost accounts for the administration of first- and second-line chemotherapy, for concomitant medications, for laboratory and biochemical examinations, and for hospitalizations due to adverse events. Unit prices used reflect 2008 and are common among National Health Service hospitals in Greece.

RESULTS:

The mean total cost of therapy in the DG group [14045 euros, 95% uncertainty interval (UI) 12628 euros-15390 euros], was significantly higher than in the VC group (8143 euros, 95% UI 7314 euros-9067 euros).

CONCLUSIONS:

Even though the combination VC has similar effectiveness compared with DG in patients with metastatic lung cancer, it is associated with a lower overall treatment cost and hence, it is preferable from an economic perspective. However, it should be noted that although VC is associated with lower cost, it is also more toxic than DG regimen, a significant parameter that should be considered in clinical decisions.

PMID:
20019086
DOI:
10.1093/annonc/mdp551
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center