Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
JAMA. 2009 Dec 16;302(23):2580-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1845.

Heterogeneity is not always noise: lessons from improvement.

Author information

1
Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. fdavidoff@cox.net

Abstract

Rigorous experimental methods suppress differences among study participants (noise) to detect true intervention effects (signals). But suppressing participants' heterogeneity obscures an essential dimension of biological and clinical knowledge. Medicine is therefore ambivalent about the influence of heterogeneity on outcomes and struggles to find ways to take it properly into account in both clinical practice and research. This analysis explores the roots of that ambivalence. Drawing on the evaluation of 2 health care improvement initiatives, this article examines the unique features of improvement that help to understand heterogeneity's influence on study methods, and suggests a variety of ways to assess the effect of heterogeneity on study outcome measures.

PMID:
20009058
DOI:
10.1001/jama.2009.1845
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
    Loading ...
    Support Center