Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Qual Health Res. 2010 May;20(5):595-606. doi: 10.1177/1049732309354094. Epub 2009 Dec 15.

Interviews and internet forums: a comparison of two sources of qualitative data.

Author information

1
Centre for Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, 2 Newark Street, London E1 2AT, United Kingdom. c.seale@qmul.ac.uk

Abstract

We report a comparative keyword analysis of interviews and Internet postings involving people with breast and prostate cancer and discussion of sexual health. Interviewees produce retrospective accounts, their content guided by interviewers' questions, which might elicit rich biographical and contextual details. Internet exchanges concern participants' current experiences and contain detailed accounts of disease processes, medical procedures, bodily processes, and, in the case of sexual health, sexual practices. They are used by participants to exchange information and support in a relatively anonymous context. Because of the ease with which large amounts of such archived Internet materials can be accessed and analyzed, this source has considerable potential for direct observation of illness experiences, although some disadvantages also exist. This reverses an earlier situation where observational research was more laborious than qualitative interviews. Observational material for research purposes is, through the Internet, now easy to obtain and produces naturalistic data.

PMID:
20008955
DOI:
10.1177/1049732309354094
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center