Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Urol Clin North Am. 2009 Nov;36(4):403-15, v. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2009.07.003.

Etiology, epidemiology, and natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Author information

1
Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin Medical School, K6-562 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792, USA. bushman@surgery.wisc.edu

Abstract

Historically, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has been a major focus of urologic practice and surgery. But a simplistic causal relationship among prostatic enlargement, progressive obstruction, lower urinary tract symptoms, retention, and complications of retention has been challenged by recognition of the incomplete overlap of prostatic enlargement with symptoms and obstruction. The result has been a greater focus on symptoms than prostatic enlargement and a shift from surgery to medical treatment. Therefore, the question can be asked whether BPH per se, the glandular enlargement as it contributes to bladder dysfunction, or hyperplastic enlargement as a biomarker for generalized lower urinary tract dysfunction are concerns. This article addresses these issues.

PMID:
19942041
DOI:
10.1016/j.ucl.2009.07.003
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center