Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Heredity (Edinb). 2010 Jun;104(6):520-33. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2009.165. Epub 2009 Nov 25.

Identifying repeats and transposable elements in sequenced genomes: how to find your way through the dense forest of programs.

Author information

1
Université de Lyon, F-6900 Lyon. lerat@biomserv.univ-lyon1.fr

Abstract

The production of genome sequences has led to another important advance in their annotation, which is closely linked to the exact determination of their content in terms of repeats, among which are transposable elements (TEs). The evolutionary implications and the presence of coding regions in some TEs can confuse gene annotation, and also hinder the process of genome assembly, making particularly crucial to be able to annotate and classify them correctly in genome sequences. This review is intended to provide an overview as comprehensive as possible of the automated methods currently used to annotate and classify TEs in sequenced genomes. Different categories of programs exist according to their methodology and the repeat, which they can identify. I describe here the main characteristics of the programs, their main goals and the difficulties they can entail. The drawbacks of the different methods are also highlighted to help biologists who are unfamiliar with algorithmic methods to understand this methodology better. Globally, using several different programs and carrying out a cross comparison of their results has the best chance of finding reliable results as any single program. However, this makes it essential to verify the results provided by each program independently. The ideal solution would be to test all programs against the same data set to obtain a true comparison of their actual performance.

PMID:
19935826
DOI:
10.1038/hdy.2009.165
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group
Loading ...
Support Center