Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Feb;55(2):335-43. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.09.004. Epub 2009 Nov 17.

Tubular toxicity in sirolimus- and cyclosporine-based transplant immunosuppression strategies: an ancillary study from a randomized controlled trial.

Author information

1
Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Sirolimus has been promoted as an agent to provide immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients that, in contrast to calcineurin inhibitors, would not be nephrotoxic. However, several reports have observed proteinuria in patients treated with sirolimus, ranging from low grade to nephrotic range. Accordingly, we compared markers of tubular and glomerular damage in an ancillary study of a randomized trial comparing sirolimus and cyclosporine.

STUDY DESIGN:

Single-center, open-label, randomized, prospective trial.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS:

Patients undergoing cadaveric or living donor kidney transplant at the University Hospital in Basel, Switzerland, between January 2001 and July 2004.

INTERVENTION:

Immunosuppression regimen consisting of cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone versus sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone.

OUTCOMES:

The primary outcome was kidney function, assessed using serum creatinine level. Secondary outcomes included patient and graft survival, number of rejections, and evidence of kidney damage, assessed using glomerular and tubular urine biomarker levels.

MEASUREMENTS:

Urine and serum were collected at 0, 7, 30, and 90 days. Kidney function was estimated using serum creatinine level. Urinary markers included alpha(1)-microglobulin and retinol-binding protein (tubular), transferrin and albumin (glomerular), and semiquantitative assessment of glucosuria. Protocol kidney biopsies were performed at days 90 and 180.

RESULTS:

There were 63 patients randomly assigned to cyclosporine-based regimens, and 64, to sirolimus-based regimens. Kidney function was similar in both groups, whereas levels of markers associated with glomerular damage (albumin, 19.5 vs 8.96 mg/mmol creatinine; P < 0.001; transferrin, 13.1 vs 5.7 mg/mmol creatinine; P < 0.001) and those associated with tubular damage (alpha(1)-microglobulin, 11 vs 7.6 mg/mmol creatinine; P = 0.004; retinol-binding protein, 19.6 vs 9.6 mg/mmol creatinine; P = 0.002) were higher beginning at day 7 in patients randomly assigned to sirolimus therapy, with similar findings through day 90. Glucosuria incidence was higher in patients randomly assigned to sirolimus therapy beginning by day 30 (65% vs 30% on day 30; P = 0.002; 51% vs 22% on day 90; P < 0.001). On histologic examination, the overall severity of tubular lesions was significantly higher in patients randomly assigned to sirolimus therapy.

LIMITATIONS:

Small sample size, short-term follow-up likely insufficient to appreciate calcineurin-associated nephropathy.

CONCLUSION:

Compared with a cyclosporine-based immunosuppression regimen, a sirolimus-based regimen is associated with de novo low-grade glomerular proteinuria, increased excretion of markers associated with tubular damage, and evidence of tubular damage on kidney biopsy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00812123.

PMID:
19926370
DOI:
10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.09.004
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center