Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Occup Health. 2010;52(1):5-13. Epub 2009 Nov 13.

Validation of alternative formulations of job strain.

Author information

1
Clinical Epidemiology Division, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland. Delphine.Courvoisier@hcuge.ch

Erratum in

  • J Occup Health. 2010;52(4):E4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To examine the construct validity of different formulations of job strain based on the demand-control(-support) model in the context of a hospital-based survey.

METHODS:

We defined the best measure of job strain as the one that would be better predicted by professional status and job characteristics and better predict health outcomes, stress and back-pain leave. We received 1,298 responses from collaborators at the University Hospitals of Geneva who responded to a questionnaire survey including all the constructs cited above and the Job Content Questionnaire.

RESULTS:

The difference between decision latitude and psychological demands (strain by subtraction), corresponded to the definition of the best measure of job strain and significantly, albeit weakly, predicted all outcomes. The logarithmic approach was the second best measure of job strain and was in fact a better predictor of stress.

CONCLUSIONS:

We would encourage researchers to explore different formulations of job strain, in particular the subtraction approach, to compute strain from demands and decision latitude.

PMID:
19915315
DOI:
10.1539/joh.l9084
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for J-STAGE, Japan Science and Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic
Loading ...
Support Center