Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Bull Cancer. 2009 Sep 1;96 Suppl 2:21-8. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2009.0891.

[A positioning pillow to improve lumbar puncture in paediatric haematology-oncology patients: a randomized controlled trial.].

[Article in French]

Author information

1
Centre Léon-Bérard, 28, rue Laennec, 69373 Lyon cedex 08, France, Service de biostatistique des hospices civils de Lyon, laboratoire biostatistique-santé université Claude-Bernard, CNRS UMR 5558, 162, avenue Lacassagne, 69003 Lyon, France, Service d'hématologie pédiatrique, hospices civils de Lyon, 69005 Lyon, France, Inserm, CIC201, Epicim, service de pharmacologie clinique du CHU de Lyon, UMR 5558, université de Lyon, 69000 Lyon, France.

Abstract

ObjectivesLumbar punctures (LPs) are common in children with cancer. Although pain management during the LP has been well standardised, dealing with stress and anxiety is not well addressed yet. Our objective was to evaluate the potential improvement of the LPs success rate using a positioning pillow, to ensure maximum lumbar flexion, and allow paravertebral muscles to relax, in children who are awake, with either conscious sedation or no sedation.Patients and methodsChildren aged 2-18 years undergoing LPs were randomly assigned to a positioning pillow or no intervention. The primary outcome was the rate of success, i.e. achieving the LPs (sampling or injection) at the first attempt, without bleeding (RBC < 50/mm3). The secondary outcomes included: the child's pain, assessed by a self-administered visual analogical scales (VAS) for children over 6 years of age; the parents' and caregivers' perception of the child's pain; the satisfaction of the children, the parents, the caregivers and the physician. The child's cooperation and the occurrence of post-LP syndrome were also evaluated.ResultsOne hundred twenty-four children (62 in each group) were included. The LP pillow tended to increase the success rate of LPs (67 vs 57%; P = 0.23), and decreased the post-LP syndromes (15 vs 24%; P = 0.17) but the differences were not statistically significant. In children over 6-year of age (N = 72), the rate of success was significantly higher in the pillow group (58.5 vs 41.5%; P = 0.031), with a tendency to feel less pain (for less pain and better satisfaction) [median VAS: 25 vs 15 mm; P = 0.39] and being more satisfied (84.4 vs 75.0%; P = 0.34).ConclusionEven if the results presented here are not as optimistic as we might have wished, we can confirm that there is a benefit in using this pillow for LPs. It is especially promising in children over 6-year of age.

PMID:
19903594
DOI:
10.1684/bdc.2009.0891
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Support Center