Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Eur J Hum Genet. 2010 Mar;18(3):296-302. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.155. Epub 2009 Oct 14.

Comparison of participant information and informed consent forms of five European studies in genetic isolated populations.

Author information

1
Institute of Genetic Medicine, European Academy Bozen/Bolzano (EURAC), Bolzano, Italy. deborah.mascalzoni@eurac.edu

Abstract

Family-based research in genetically isolated populations is an effective approach for identifying loci influencing variation in disease traits. In common with all studies in humans, those in genetically isolated populations need ethical approval; however, existing ethical frameworks may be inadequate to protect participant privacy and confidentiality and to address participants' information needs in such populations. Using the ethical-legal guidelines of the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) as a template, we compared the participant information leaflets and consent forms of studies in five European genetically isolated populations to identify additional information that should be incorporated into information leaflets and consent forms to guarantee satisfactorily informed consent. We highlight the additional information that participants require on the research purpose and the reasons why their population was chosen; on the potential risks and benefits of participation; on the opportunities for benefit sharing; on privacy; on the withdrawal of consent and on the disclosure of genetic data. This research raises some important issues that should be addressed properly and identifies relevant types of information that should be incorporated into information leaflets for this type of study.

PMID:
19826451
PMCID:
PMC2987217
DOI:
10.1038/ejhg.2009.155
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center