Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Vet J. 2010 Sep;185(3):259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.06.014. Epub 2009 Aug 25.

The evaluation of bias in scrapie surveillance: a review.

Author information

1
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), London, UK. victor.delriovilas@defra.gsi.gov.uk

Abstract

Evaluation of surveillance systems is a common practice in the context of human health, but only recently has been applied in the veterinary field. Commonly, a series of attributes are monitored to assess the system. Suboptimal performance of the surveillance in relation to any of these attributes may lead to bias in the surveillance results. The intensity of scrapie surveillance has increased considerably in recent years as a result of public health concerns. In this paper, a number of approaches described in the literature for the evaluation of surveillance systems are reviewed, with a focus on the sensitivity and representativeness attributes of scrapie surveillance systems in the European Union. Many of the methods applied in other fields, such as ecology and public health, are exchangeable and relevant for scrapie surveillance.

PMID:
19709907
DOI:
10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.06.014
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center