Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 May;24(3):201-7. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acp031. Epub 2009 Jul 29.

On becoming a peer reviewer for a neuropsychology journal.

Author information

1
Deparment of Psychiatry, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, 1-308 MEB, Iowa City, IA 52242-1000, USA. kevin-duff@uiowa.edu

Abstract

The peer-review process is an invaluable service provided by the professional community, and it provides the critical foundation for the advancement of science. However, there is remarkably little systematic guidance for individuals who wish to become part of this process. This paper, written from the perspective of reviewers and editors with varying levels of experience, provides general guidelines and advice for new reviewers in neuropsychology, as well as outlining benefits of participation in this process. It is hoped that the current information will encourage individuals at all levels to become involved in peer-reviewing for neuropsychology journals.

PMID:
19640873
DOI:
10.1093/arclin/acp031
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center