Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Proteome Res. 2009 Sep;8(9):4173-81. doi: 10.1021/pr9004794.

False discovery rates of protein identifications: a strike against the two-peptide rule.

Author information

  • 1Bioinformatics Program and Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. ngupta@ucsd.edu

Abstract

Most proteomics studies attempt to maximize the number of peptide identifications and subsequently infer proteins containing two or more peptides as reliable protein identifications. In this study, we evaluate the effect of this "two-peptide" rule on protein identifications, using multiple search tools and data sets. Contrary to the intuition, the "two-peptide" rule reduces the number of protein identifications in the target database more significantly than in the decoy database and results in increased false discovery rates, compared to the case when single-hit proteins are not discarded. We therefore recommend that the "two-peptide" rule should be abandoned, and instead, protein identifications should be subject to the estimation of error rates, as is the case with peptide identifications. We further extend the generating function approach (originally proposed for evaluating matches between a peptide and a single spectrum) to evaluating matches between a protein and an entire spectral data set.

PMID:
19627159
PMCID:
PMC3398614
DOI:
10.1021/pr9004794
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for American Chemical Society Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center