Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Am Diet Assoc. 1991 Dec;91(12):1538-42.

Comparison of three consecutive-day and three random-day records of dietary intake.

Author information

1
Nutrition Program, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109.

Abstract

We conducted this study to determine whether 3 days of dietary records from randomly selected days or from consecutive days more closely estimated the energy and nutrient intake values obtained from 16 days over a 1-year period. Participants consisted of 228 men and women, black and white. No one of three random-day samples or one of five consecutive-day samples better estimated energy and nutrient intake. The group means for intake of energy and seven nutrients were similar for random and consecutive days. However, for energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate, and calcium, the means of the absolute differences between the values for 16 days and those for the random days were significantly smaller than the corresponding means between the values for 16 days and those for consecutive days. Random-day samples may be preferable for describing dietary intake of individuals and small groups when the gain in reliability is worth the cost.

PMID:
1960346
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Support Center