Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Respir Med. 2009 Dec;103(12):1892-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Jul 7.

Nitric oxide diffusing capacity versus spirometry in the early diagnosis of emphysema in smokers.

Author information

1
Spaarne Hospital, Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands. vdlee@tiscali.nl

Abstract

The diffusion capacity for nitric oxide (DLNO) is independent of pulmonary capillary blood volume and equals the membrane diffusing capacity. Therefore the DLNO could be more sensitive in detecting alveolar destruction than the DLCO. We measured flow-volumes curves, DLNO, DLCO, the transfer coefficients KNO (DLNO/VA) and KCO (DLCO/VA) and performed computed tomography (CT) scans in 263 randomly selected heavy smokers. Subjects with areas > or =1% of the total lung volume showing an attenuation <-950 Hounsfield Units were considered to have emphysema. In 36 subjects emphysema was diagnosed with CT, a low KNO was present in 94 subjects, and in 95 subjects a FEV1/FVC ratio <70% was seen. The area under the ROC curve for detection CT-based emphysema was 0.894 for the KNO, 0.822 for the KCO and 0.795 for FEV1/FVC, meaning that the KNO has a slightly higher sensitivity to detect emphysema than the KCO and FEV1/FVC. The positive predictive value of KNO however was low (34.7%), while the negative predictive value of KNO was very high (98.2%), indicating an emphysema exclusion test. The DLNO/DLCO ratio is significantly higher in the study group compared to normal subjects.

PMID:
19586765
DOI:
10.1016/j.rmed.2009.06.005
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center