Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 Jul;64(1):9-15. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp159. Epub 2009 May 18.

Nasal decolonization of Staphylococcus aureus with mupirocin: strengths, weaknesses and future prospects.

Author information

1
University College London, London, UK. acoates@sgul.ac.uk

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus in the nose is a risk factor for endogenous staphylococcal infection. UK guidelines recommend the use of mupirocin for nasal decolonization in certain groups of patients colonized with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Mupirocin is effective at removing S. aureus from the nose over a few weeks, but relapses are common within several months. There are only a few prospective randomized clinical trials that have been completed with sufficient patients, but those that have been reported suggest that clearance of S. aureus from the nose is beneficial in some patient groups for the reduction in the incidence of nosocomial infections. There is no convincing evidence that mupirocin treatment reduces the incidence of surgical site infection. New antibiotics are needed to decolonize the nose because bacterial resistance to mupirocin is rising, and so it will become less effective. Furthermore, a more bactericidal antibiotic than mupirocin is needed, on the grounds that it might reduce the relapse rate, and so clear the patient of MRSA for a longer period of time than mupirocin.

PMID:
19451132
PMCID:
PMC2692503
DOI:
10.1093/jac/dkp159
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center