Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Water Environ Res. 2009 Apr;81(4):432-40.

Comparison of the modeling approach between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge processes.

Author information

1
BIOMATH, Department of Applied Mathematics, Biometrics and Process Control, Ghent University, Gent, Flanders, Belgium. tao.jiang@biomath.ugent.be

Abstract

Activated sludge models (ASM) have been developed and largely applied in conventional activated sludge (CAS) systems. The applicability of ASM to model membrane bioreactors (MBR) and the differences in modeling approaches have not been studied in detail. A laboratory-scale MBR was modeled using ASM2d. It was found that the ASM2d model structure can still be used for MBR modeling. There are significant differences related to ASM modeling. First, a lower maximum specific growth rate for MBR nitrifiers was estimated. Independent experiments demonstrated that this might be attributed to the inhibition effect of soluble microbial products (SMP) at elevated concentration. Second, a greater biomass affinity to oxygen and ammonium was found, which was probably related to smaller MBR sludge flocs. Finally, the membrane throughput during membrane backwashing/relaxation can be normalized and the membrane can be modeled as a continuous flow-through point separator. This simplicity has only a minor effect on ASM simulation results; however, it significantly improved simulation speed.

PMID:
19445333
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Support Center