#### Send to
jQuery(document).ready( function () {
jQuery("#send_to_menu input[type='radio']").click( function () {
var selectedValue = jQuery(this).val().toLowerCase();
var selectedDiv = jQuery("#send_to_menu div." + selectedValue);
if(selectedDiv.is(":hidden")){
jQuery("#send_to_menu div.submenu:visible").slideUp();
selectedDiv.slideDown();
}
});
});
jQuery("#sendto").bind("ncbipopperclose", function(){
jQuery("#send_to_menu div.submenu:visible").css("display","none");
jQuery("#send_to_menu input[type='radio']:checked").attr("checked",false);
});

# Balance point characterization of interstitial fluid volume regulation.

### Author information

- 1
- Michael E. DeBakey Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4466, USA.

### Abstract

The individual processes involved in interstitial fluid volume and protein regulation (microvascular filtration, lymphatic return, and interstitial storage) are relatively simple, yet their interaction is exceedingly complex. There is a notable lack of a first-order, algebraic formula that relates interstitial fluid pressure and protein to critical parameters commonly used to characterize the movement of interstitial fluid and protein. Therefore, the purpose of the present study is to develop a simple, transparent, and general algebraic approach that predicts interstitial fluid pressure (P(i)) and protein concentrations (C(i)) that takes into consideration all three processes. Eight standard equations characterizing fluid and protein flux were solved simultaneously to yield algebraic equations for P(i) and C(i) as functions of parameters characterizing microvascular, interstitial, and lymphatic function. Equilibrium values of P(i) and C(i) arise as balance points from the graphical intersection of transmicrovascular and lymph flows (analogous to Guyton's classical cardiac output-venous return curves). This approach goes beyond describing interstitial fluid balance in terms of conservation of mass by introducing the concept of inflow and outflow resistances. Algebraic solutions demonstrate that P(i) and C(i) result from a ratio of the microvascular filtration coefficient (1/inflow resistance) and effective lymphatic resistance (outflow resistance), and P(i) is unaffected by interstitial compliance. These simple algebraic solutions predict P(i) and C(i) that are consistent with reported measurements. The present work therefore presents a simple, transparent, and general balance point characterization of interstitial fluid balance resulting from the interaction of microvascular, interstitial, and lymphatic function.

- PMID:
- 19420292
- PMCID:
- PMC2711695
- DOI:
- 10.1152/ajpregu.00097.2009

- [Indexed for MEDLINE]

### Publication types, MeSH terms, Substance, Grant support

#### Publication types

- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

#### MeSH terms

- Animals
- Blood Pressure
- Blood Proteins/metabolism*
- Capillary Permeability
- Compliance
- Dogs
- Edema/metabolism*
- Edema/physiopathology
- Extracellular Fluid/metabolism*
- Lymph/metabolism
- Lymphatic System/metabolism*
- Lymphatic System/physiopathology
- Microcirculation
- Microvessels/metabolism*
- Microvessels/physiopathology
- Models, Biological*
- Osmosis
- Reproducibility of Results
- Sheep
- Vascular Resistance
- Water-Electrolyte Balance*