Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jun 16;150(12):840-8, W150-1. Epub 2009 May 4.

Stent placement in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and impaired renal function: a randomized trial.

Author information

1
Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Little is known about the efficacy and safety of renal artery stenting in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) and impaired renal function.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the efficacy and safety of stent placement in patients with ARAS and impaired renal function.

DESIGN:

Randomized clinical trial. Randomization was centralized and computer generated, and allocation was assigned by e-mail. Patients, providers, and persons who assessed outcomes were not blinded to treatment assignment.

SETTING:

10 European medical centers.

PARTICIPANTS:

140 patients with creatinine clearance less than 80 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) and ARAS of 50% or greater.

INTERVENTION:

Stent placement and medical treatment (64 patients) or medical treatment only (76 patients). Medical treatment consisted of antihypertensive treatment, a statin, and aspirin.

MEASUREMENTS:

The primary end point was a 20% or greater decrease in creatinine clearance. Secondary end points included safety and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS:

Forty-six of 64 patients assigned to stent placement had the procedure. Ten of the 64 patients (16%) in the stent placement group and 16 patients (22%) in the medication group reached the primary end point (hazard ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.33 to 1.61]). Serious complications occurred in the stent group, including 2 procedure-related deaths (3%), 1 late death secondary to an infected hematoma, and 1 patient who required dialysis secondary to cholesterol embolism. The groups did not differ for other secondary end points.

LIMITATION:

Many patients were falsely identified as having renal artery stenosis greater than 50% by noninvasive imaging and did not ultimately require stenting.

CONCLUSION:

Stent placement with medical treatment had no clear effect on progression of impaired renal function but led to a small number of significant procedure-related complications. The study findings favor a conservative approach to patients with ARAS, focused on cardiovascular risk factor management and avoiding stenting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00150943.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center