Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Malar J. 2009 Apr 28;8:85. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-85.

A retrospective analysis of the change in anti-malarial treatment policy: Peru.

Author information

1
Malaria Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Mail Stop F-60, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, USA. hbw2@cdc.gov

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

National malaria control programmes must deal with the complex process of changing national malaria treatment guidelines, often without guidance on the process of change. Selecting a replacement drug is only one issue in this process. There is a paucity of literature describing successful malaria treatment policy changes to help guide control programs through this process.

OBJECTIVES:

To understand the wider context in which national malaria treatment guidelines were formulated in a specific country (Peru).

METHODS:

Using qualitative methods (individual and focus group interviews, stakeholder analysis and a review of documents), a retrospective analysis of the process of change in Peru's anti-malarial treatment policy from the early 1990's to 2003 was completed.

RESULTS:

The decision to change Peru's policies resulted from increasing levels of anti-malarial drug resistance, as well as complaints from providers that the drugs were no longer working. The context of the change occurred in a time in which Peru was changing national governments, which created extreme challenges in moving the change process forward. Peru utilized a number of key strategies successfully to ensure that policy change would occur. This included a) having the process directed by a group who shared a common interest in malaria and who had long-established social and professional networks among themselves, b) engaging in collaborative teamwork among nationals and between nationals and international collaborators, c) respect for and inclusion of district-level staff in all phases of the process, d) reliance on high levels of technical and scientific knowledge, e) use of standardized protocols to collect data, and f) transparency.

CONCLUSION:

Although not perfectly or fully implemented by 2003, the change in malaria treatment policy in Peru occurred very quickly, as compared to other countries. They identified a problem, collected the data necessary to justify the change, utilized political will to their favor, approved the policy, and moved to improve malaria control in their country. As such, they offer an excellent example for other countries as they contemplate or embark on policy changes.

PMID:
19400953
PMCID:
PMC2684118
DOI:
10.1186/1475-2875-8-85
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center